Al Smith Social media in local government

4Sep/093

Advertisement on newcastle.gov.uk

Below is a draft proposal for advertisement on Newcastle City Council's website. There's also a very useful policy here

Introduction

The council homepage typically attracts around 300,000 unique visitors each month. These visitors use the council website to search for information relevant to their experience of the city. In order to offset the cost of providing these facilities and of maintaining the quality and relevance of content it may be desirable to use the website to generate revenue.

Based on figures provided by other councils we could perhaps generate £15,000-£20,000 p.a. by hosting advertisements on the site.

Options

1. Carry on with the current model without advertisement
+ No additional associated costs
+ Avoid controversy
+ Does not change aesthetic values of site
- Does not generate revenue
- Misses out on added value of adverts

2. Manage advertisement in-house. Expand the current advertisement sales capacity in the communication and marketing team to cover selling space on the website and provide design services
+ Full control over placement and content of advertisers
+ Revenue generation
+ Added value for visitors
- Costs of management may outweigh income
- Extra demands at a time when capacity is threatened

3. Seek outside agency to manage advertisement for us
+ Revenue generation
+ No additional costs
+ Added value for visitors
- Commission taken by supplier
- Need to work closely with supplier to define appropriate advertisers

Recommendations

To maximise the value of the website, to cover the staff costs of moderation, and to fund innovation and research it is my recommendation that the council pursue the third option. Further to this I would recommend that we select a supplier with other public sector clients so that our specific requirements are understood.

Option one does not provide revenue generation and option two would require too much officer time to manage.

Concerns over monetisation of this resource raised by the public can be offset by explaining that these actions help to keep costs down. In addition advertisements may point the customer to relevant content on other sites which we do not hold ourselves. As such if a customer is seeking information on a health issue we would be able to direct them to retailers of relevant products through advertisements, without specific endorsement of the retailer.

Adverts should be held off site and content pulled through online; this would mean we would not have to host third party content on our servers beyond the source code required for this. This would pose no risk to our servers and little demand on capacity.

The code itself should be capable of being cut and pasted into webpage templates, this is a job which should take less than one hour and should not require ongoing commitment.

It is my understanding that the communication and marketing team would have the skills and expertise to liaise with the chosen supplier. All ongoing moderation of advert content would therefore be carried out by the communication and marketing team.

The next step would be to seek a suitable supplier, pending acceptance of these recommendations.

Examples of other local authorities using ads

http://www.fylde.gov.uk
http://www.nottingham.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=171
http://www.merton.gov.uk/learning.htm
http://www.huntsdc.gov.uk/
http://www.westoxon.gov.uk/living/Housing.cfm
http://www.weymouth.gov.uk

  • Share/Bookmark
11Aug/091

How did you like the chocolate factory, Charlie?

Google's LocalGov Seminar at their London HQ had a few interesting points to consider for those attending, and those now hearing the reports from the day. Not least, it seems, that the day was not very well tailored to the audience.

But it's best not to dwell on the negatives. This was (hopefully) the first step in a relationship between local government and Google that will lead to co-operation, support and new ways of working. As people seem to want that more than paid-for advertising solutions.

Adwords were discussed in an opening session, perhaps wrongly focusing on transactional functions such as payment of council tax. High placement on Google council tax searches may be desirable so residents can find out where to pay, but as they can't pay their tax to another councils this is not something you would normally pay for. After all, I'd tend to search for my council AND council tax.

A case study was given on Hillingdon's use of Adwords to promote a Christmas ice-rink, which was a better idea and may be of some interest to our marketing team as we all try to make our budgets go further.

Analytics and conversion provided a brief how-to on what makes a good website and how to track abandoned shopping carts etc. Again, a presentation that focused on the transactional but highlighted a tool which could prove an alternative to others such as Websense.

Then, one of the most controversial topics of the day. Google AdSense. Do you want paid-for advertising on your site? If you do, why choose Google? Fair enough, it seemed a large number of people in the room had been asked to looking into advertising solutions for their sites, as 'alternative revenue streams' are increasingly mentioned. AdSense provides one solution and allows for family-safe advertisements, filtered by category on selected areas of the site. Downsides are retrospective blocking of individual ads and lack of monitoring.

A case study from Nottingham City Council did little to stop the murmurs. Nottingham's new website is an attempt to create a personalised council homepage, providing an alternative destination site (which is a bit Marmite it seems). Their case-study outlined that part of this development was paid for by AdSense revenue. Okay, so even if you don't like ads this may be an incentive.

Nottingham's traffic seems comparable to Newcastle's so I was interested to hear the figures, and it brings in approx £15k p.a., a contribution, but not a major one considering the revelations about the cost of Birmingham City Council's web development. Given slightly larger traffic to Newcastle's site it may be something to look at, but not a huge revenue stream. (It was also slightly concerning that a banner ad on an events page seemed to advertise a theme park nobody had heard about and was not labelled as a Google placed ad.)

The issue of negative feedback to ads on council sites was also brought up. Nottingham had received three complaints in 12 months relating to advertisement. But a full user survey may turn up others who do not like the advertisements but have not taken time to complain.

The next talk on Enterprise Solutions was a highlight. Use of GoogleMail, Docs etc. in an organisation as an alternative to MS to work collaboratively, quickly and flexibly. But this talk was a bit like preaching to the choir, and maybe the people in the room were not the ones who needed to hear about the savings and improvements on offer. It may take time, but it would be good to open up a conversation around this. Even on a pilot basis.

After lunch we looked at being creative with YouTube. Which is great. We watched a few videos, including this one that I highlighted on Twitter the other week. But we also got to see that it's actually easier than I had thought to add features to videos.

OpenSocial, featured in the next session, seems to be an attempt at universal login to sites, carrying your contacts with you. Nice idea, I liked that you could see your friends contributions to sites seperately from others, i.e. those whose views you value higher. It seemed to work off the peg too, so may be a solution for comment enabled council websites. Not sure if it works pre-mod though, which may put some off.

Next talk was on Android... lots of people have mobile phones... smart phone ownership increasing... why not create apps on Android platform... here's some demos... Android has 8% of market.

Finally a talk on Google Maps. Which are nice. People like them, we'd love to use them, but can't because of issues between Google and OS. If we buy Google Maps Premium we can use Google Maps apparently, so there appears to be some progress in this area.

So that's what happened. We came. We listened to a (slightly off-topic) sales pitch. We went home.

But it's a start as I say. Google got plenty of feedback from the day and hopefully there are a few things people can take away and build into what they're doing.

Google also have a dedicated webpage for this. And Carrie Bishop blogged about the day too.

  • Share/Bookmark

Web 2.0 strategies for local govt (specifically Newcastle City Council), football fan, music lover and cynic.

The views expressed here are my own and are not necessarily those of the Council itself.

Pages

Tags

advertising blogging case study corporate communications corporate identity Councillors crime elections Engagement European Elections Facebook FBE09 Flip cameras freealncl Google googlelocalgov hayfever house style Jack Pickard kleenex Liz Azyan maps navigation Newcastle City Council petition Planning Policy press office psfbuzz public sector refresh RSS schoolclosures Social Media The Cooperage twibbon Twitter UKGC09 ukhols uksnow UsNow website wiki win YouTube

Posts by month

September 2010
M T W T F S S
« Mar    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Find Al on social networks

Latest tweets

Links